ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学位論文
  2. 学位論文

ボンガード不良設定問題の解導出と等価な最小論理集合を再構成する述語論理アーキテクチャに関する研究

https://doi.org/10.18997/00008105
https://doi.org/10.18997/00008105
a6555d14-3937-4cb9-8f1f-025b4529abce
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
sei_k_374.pdf sei_k_374.pdf (17.3 MB)
アイテムタイプ 学位論文 = Thesis or Dissertation(1)
公開日 2021-03-25
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
資源タイプ doctoral thesis
タイトル
タイトル A Description Logic Architecture to Reconstitute the Minimal Semantic Representation Equivalent to the Unique Solution of Bongard’s Ill-Posed Problems Considered to be Incapable Without Human Intuition
言語 en
タイトル
タイトル ボンガード不良設定問題の解導出と等価な最小論理集合を再構成する述語論理アーキテクチャに関する研究
言語 ja
言語
言語 eng
著者 Jisha, Maniamma

× Jisha, Maniamma

en Jisha, Maniamma

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Human intelligence relying on brain information processing has two aspects of implicit memory and explicit memory functions. A possible hypothesis is that human intelligence is a consequence of the fusion of those two aspects, and then a question is addressed as to how the flexibility of making a frame of thinking depending on the context is reconstructed by the fusion. In the assumption that an autonomous classifier provides primitive labels indicating parts in a picture and a generalizer to represent the whole in an abstract way, the problem that remains unsolved is how semantic information can be coordinated to reach a conclusion to connect parts and the whole. Bongard problems question such an issue in the form of logical picture puzzles to request to seek the unique minimum description of pictures to discriminate two groups, throughout abductive reasoning. Bongard Problems (BPs) are a set of 100 visual puzzles introduced by M. M. Bongard in the mid-1960s. BPs have been established as benchmark puzzles for understanding the human context-based learning abilities to solve ill-posed problems. The puzzle requires the logical explanation as to the answer to distinguish two classes of figures from redundant options, which can be obtained by a thinking process to alternatively change the target frame (hierarchical level of analogy) of thinking from a wide range concept networks as D. R. Hofstadter suggested. Some minor research results to solve a limited set of BPs have reported based a single architecture accompanied with probabilistic approaches; however the central problem on BP’s difficulties is the requirement of flexible changes of the target frame; therefore non-hierarchical cluster analyses do not provide the essential solution, and hierarchical probabilistic models need to include unnecessary levels for learning from the beginning to prevent a prompt decision making. Only possible combinations of primitive descriptions like ‘circle in a triangle’ are arisen as a test hypothesis to represent them commonly, and then it is verified whether it matches all pictures totally in each group. The tested hypotheses from two groups are compared, and it will be the solution if there are logically different, such as ‘circle in a triangle’ v.s. ‘triangle in a circle.’ We hypothesized that the logical reasoning process with limited numbers of metadata descriptions realizes the sophisticated and prompt decision-making, and the performance is validated by using BPs. In this study, a semantic web-based hierarchical model to solve BPs was proposed as the minimum and transparent system to mimic the human-logical inference process in solving of BPs by using the Description Logic (DL) with assertions on concepts (TBox) and individuals (ABox). Our computer experiment showed that 65 Bongard problems were solved in the proposed framework. It indicates that the semantic information coordinator works well to solve a type of frame problem by coupling with an autonomous classifier and generalizer. The framework may contribute to the design of the general artificial intelligence in part, especially on coordination against autonomy in semantics. In summary, this thesis helps to pave the practical approach of understanding ill-posed problems and working towards solving them using ontologies. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the semantic network and description logic, and then the common principle is expected to be formulated, and the principle explains why the semantics and logic work well to solve the BPs to avoid an infinite time for the calculation. Our results demonstrated that the proposed model not only provided individual solutions as a BP solver but also proved the correctness of Hofstadter’s idea as the flexible frame with concept networks for BPs in our actual implementation, which no one has ever achieved. This in fact will open the new horizon for theories for designing logical reasoning systems, especially for critical judgments and serious decision-making as expert humans do in a transparent and descriptive way of why they judged so.
目次
内容記述タイプ TableOfContents
内容記述 1 Introduction||2 Semantic Web Technology||3 An RDF Based Knowledge Representation Towards Solving BP #39||4 A Semantic Web-based Representation of Human-logical Inference for Solving Bongard Problems||5 Solving BP with Dependent Properties||6 Discussion and Conclusion
備考
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 九州工業大学博士学位論文 学位記番号:生工博甲第374号 学位授与年月日:令和2年3月25日
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Bongard Problem (BPs)
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Meta-data Ontology
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Resource Descriptive Framework (RDF)
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL)
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Web Ontology Language (OWL)
アドバイザー
我妻, 広明
学位授与番号
学位授与番号 甲第374号
学位名
学位名 博士(工学)
学位授与年月日
学位授与年月日 2020-03-25
学位授与機関
学位授与機関識別子Scheme kakenhi
学位授与機関識別子 17104
学位授与機関名 九州工業大学
学位授与年度
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 令和元年度
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
ID登録
ID登録 10.18997/00008105
ID登録タイプ JaLC
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 12:54:49.485230
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3