WEKO3
アイテム
Score Allotment Optimization Method with Application to Comparison of Ability Evaluation in Testing between Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory
http://hdl.handle.net/10228/5320
http://hdl.handle.net/10228/5320b9584190-583d-48f1-8ad2-086cd4768e80
名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
---|---|---|
![]() |
|
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 = Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2015-01-06 | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Score Allotment Optimization Method with Application to Comparison of Ability Evaluation in Testing between Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
著者 |
廣瀬, 英雄
× 廣瀬, 英雄× Sakumura, Takenori× Kuwahata, Takayuki |
|||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Many researchers know the superiority of the item response theory (IRT) over the classical test theory (CTT) from a detailed test-evaluation viewpoint. However, teachers are still reluctant to use the IRT as a daily testing tool. The primary objective of this paper is to nd the difference between the CTT and the IRT. In particular, we focus on the difference in ability evaluation. We compared the CTT and IRT evaluated abilities by using the hypothetically assumed abilities that are mimicked to a real case. By using a simulation study, we found that the IRT is superior to the CTT to some extent. The CTT uses pre-assigned allotments contrary to the IRT which has no allotment concept. However, if we regard the ability evaluation by the IRT as the standard, we can nd the most appropriate allotments in the CTT so that the total scores of the CTT are adjusted as close as possible to the abilities obtained by the IRT. This is a kind of allotment optimization problem. We show the methodology in this paper. By applying our methodology to some simulation cases that mimic the real data case, we found an intriguing feature with respect to the pre-assigned allotments. If teachers want to raise the examination pass rate, we guess that they give higher scores than the actual scores achieved by students; we call this jacking-up. Using the allotment optimization, we have found that jacking-up causes higher allotments to easier problems in the CTT. | |||||
書誌情報 |
Information 巻 17, 号 2, p. 391-410, 発行日 2014-02 |
|||||
出版社 | ||||||
出版者 | International Information Institute | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 1343-4500 | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 1344-8994 | |||||
著作権関連情報 | ||||||
権利情報 | ©2014 International Information Institute | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Ability evaluation | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Classical test theory | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Item response theory | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Allotment optimization | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Jack-up | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Least square | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Gradient descent | |||||
出版タイプ | ||||||
出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
査読の有無 | ||||||
値 | yes | |||||
研究者情報 | ||||||
https://hyokadb02.jimu.kyutech.ac.jp/html/228_ja.html | ||||||
連携ID | ||||||
5042 | ||||||
情報源 | ||||||
識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
関連識別子 | http://www.information-iii.org/ | |||||
関連名称 | http://www.information-iii.org/ |