ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学術雑誌論文
  2. 5 技術(工学)

Online Grammar Checkers Versus Self-Editing: An Investigation of Error Correction Rates and Writing Quality

http://hdl.handle.net/10228/00008802
http://hdl.handle.net/10228/00008802
634bd86e-dc46-4723-90a6-17559e114a67
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
jonus.vol7iss1pp441-458.pdf jonus.vol7iss1pp441-458.pdf (589.8 kB)
Item type 学術雑誌論文 = Journal Article(1)
公開日 2022-04-14
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
タイトル
タイトル Online Grammar Checkers Versus Self-Editing: An Investigation of Error Correction Rates and Writing Quality
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
著者 ロング, ロバート ウィリアム

× ロング, ロバート ウィリアム

WEKO 3992
e-Rad 00284589
ORCiD 0000-0002-8693-1783

ja ロング, ロバート ウィリアム

en Long, Robert William


Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 Background and Purpose: In order to compete with native speakers, EFL and ESL students are under more pressure to produce native-like academic papers. This has led to more reliance on online grammar checkers, but these can be ineffective with regards to identifying and giving feedback on particular grammatical forms, phrasing and issues relating to style. Language learners may not be effectively correcting these errors. Hence, this study aims to examine the effectiveness of one online grammar checker, grammarly.com, with that of self-editing. / Methodology: This case study employed a descriptive approach to data analysis. 199 essays were collected from undergraduates at four universities in Kyushu, dated from April, 2019 to January, 2020. 99 essays were proofed by an online grammar checker, while 100 essays were self-edited. The English proficiency level of the participants was at the lower to intermediate range (i.e., TOEIC 300 to a TOEIC 500). The online grammar checker Grammarly was utilized by all participants to minimize issues relating to feedback. In the analysis of data, the complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF) of the essays was assessed in order to examine the significant changes between the first and other drafts, and the types of errors produced. / Findings: Results showed that there were no significant differences found in terms of the methods of editing, although the participants who employed online grammar checkers had better results. It was also shown that there were no significant differences in terms of syntactical complexity with either method of editing. There were fewer errors committed by the participants who self-edited, but there were no significant differences in the edited drafts with regards to errors/100 ratios, error-free clauses, and error-free clause ratios. The study showed marginal differences between the two methods of proofing but indicated that online tools can be useful for identifying certain grammatical errors. / Contributions: This paper argues that educators need to work more with EFL learners on the editorial and proofing process, but online grammar checkers may be a useful pedagogical tool to help low-proficient L2 learners.
書誌情報 en : Journal of Nusantara Studies

巻 7, 号 1, p. 441-458, 発行日 2022-01-13
出版社
出版者 Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin
言語 en
DOI
関連タイプ isIdenticalTo
識別子タイプ DOI
関連識別子 https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol7iss1pp441-458
日本十進分類法
主題Scheme NDC
主題 548
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ EISSN
収録物識別子 0127-9386
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 0127-9319
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 Writing quality
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 editing
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 online grammar checkers
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 proofing
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 syntactical complexity
出版タイプ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
査読の有無
値 yes
研究者情報
URL https://hyokadb02.jimu.kyutech.ac.jp/html/178_ja.html
論文ID(連携)
値 10390222
連携ID
値 10327
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 13:01:15.298747
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3